For the record, I honestly don't identify with any political organisation at all, I hate the idea of some other person representing me (as in, presenting me but with a twist that furthers their agenda.) I present myself, and i'm often inclined to look for the solution to a given issue between and beyond whatever two extremes are being thrown around. And then there's the paradox of finding myself agreeing with many "primitive" religious traditions from a purely metaphysical perspective despite being a staunch advocate of progress, however you want to define that nebulous term. It's a mess to explain.
My critique is that the test doesn't take into account that some people might think money, trade and bartering are unnecessary. It only asked how we should do those things. For me, it made answering some questions difficult. But, overall, I do agree with the results.
Interesting to see these two contrasted, and interesting to see how my perspectives have changed over time. It would be fascinating to take these kinds of questionnaires once a year or so and see how they shift.