So what makes one human?

Some humans identify as non-human, or other-than-human. Many humans who identify as 100% human tell them "You are human, isn't that obvious?". Apart from the fact that this answer is most often given without much thought, but lots of social conditioning behind it, what actually makes one human?
Here I share the answers I have come across and how they relate to the question of myself being human or not.

1. Having a human body
Almost all people define anyone who has got a human body as a human. This makes sense, because a human body contains human genes and a human brain, which both influence us quite much, even if another part of us is nonhuman. However, I believe that every person has a soul. Even if you don't believe in souls, I think we can agree that humans are more than the sum of their physical parts.
I've got a human body of course, with human genes and a human brain. But since I'm autistic, my brain doesn't work like that of a normal human. So if my human brain is significantly different from 99% of other human brains, and my genes could contain mutations that significantly affect parts of the brain, am I still 100% human? Or only 99,99998% human (and the other 0,00002% are what? Offside-human?)?

Some people define a human by certain psychological qualities of a person (normally someone with a human body). I have come across the following:
2. "Humans are social creatures"
This definition excludes everyone who has Schizoid Personality Disorder and some autistic people from being human. It probably originated upon discovering that humans evolved from apes, which are social creatures.
It was yelled at me after I told someone that I do not want to socialize. I was 13 years old at the time and already felt non-human. Hearing this only made me feel even more non-human.
I was never diagnosed with Schizoid Personality Disorder, but concerning my professional Asperger's diagnosis, I scored 2,5 and 3,5 standard deviations on something called the "Scale of Social Reactivity" (translation from native language). I was deemed "severely impaired" in all areas (social awareness, social cognition, social communication, social motivation, autistic mannerisms). I scored -0,5 standard deviations on the Autism part, so my Autism symptoms were called "moderate". Other things that are noted in my diagnostic report: I never express a desire for social contacts. As a toddler, I showed no interest in my peers and was clueless on how to play roleplaying games. Most of the time I did not play social games that involved imitation. I remember that I could imitate others if I wanted to, but had no impulse to do so and generally did not learn from imitation.
"But this was when you were a toddler or a teen, now you're a young adult!" - Yes, and I have very little desire for social contact. Normally I meet a few other humans for about 2 - 5 hours per week (work excluded), that's enough social contact for me. Having as much social contact as most other people would exhaust me to the point of burnout. I have no desire for human friends (currently I've got 2 friends, a demon and a dog, and the demon is not an imaginary friend for me). I have been home alone for 2 weeks without face-to-face human contact during the pandemic - did not feel lonely and got no psychological damage from it. As a toddler I rarely imitated anything, maybe because I had little to no subconcious imitation impulses.
...And you want to tell me I'm a primate? Are you kidding me? I feel like I have the body of a primate, but inside, I'm not even close to being an ape. Even a cat is more social than I am! By the definition of "Humans are social creatures", I am clearly non-human.

3. Capacity for Emotional Empathy
This definition excludes everyone who has Psychopathy, many people with Cluster B personality disorders (antisocial, borderline, histrionic, narcissistic) and some autistic people from being human. I dislike this definition because I think many people use it in order to tell themselves they are "saints" and project their dark side on people with certain personality disorders. That's how we get those people who say "I would never do [enter crime / abuse]!", and when they're in a bad situation or feel angry, desperate, etc., they commit the crime that they swore "I would never do...!".
My emotional empathy is abnormal. When someone gets hurt, I will either automatically laugh and think it's funny (I'm not a sadist in this situation, cause their pain just doesn't enter my thoughts, even if they are crying or bleeding in front of me) or I will have the normal reaction of being shocked, distraught, angry, etc. The former has led me into some troubling situations where I had to pretend I was crying when I was actually laughing, suppress my laughter (that's hard) or find pretty lame excuses for why "I don't think it's funny that you got hurt, something else is" so I wouldn't get into even more trouble.
Am I a bad person because of this? I would say no. I can neither predict nor control what will happen inside of me when someone gets hurt. I do not choose to automatically think it's funny, it just happens and I cannot change it. But I can still help someone or call for help. And normally, that's what I do if it's possible.
If a human is defined by feeling emotional empathy, and my emotional empathy is randomly activated or not, am I 100% human by that definition? Or only 50% human?

4. Imperfection
Neatly summed up as "You're (only) human", this is another widespread definition of what a human makes. Namely, flaws and mistakes pertaining to character and ethics. I think this definition is problematic because imperfection is not exclusive to humans. No creature is perfect. Ever read of animal mothers abandoning and even culling their babies, because they have a low chance of survival? How cruel, and how wrong! I think what separates humans from animals is that humans are aware of their imperfections, character flaws and immoral wrongdoings.
But if there are other creatures that are aware of their shortcomings, for example angels and demons, then simply having this awareness does not a human make. If you don't believe in spiritual beings, consider that the definition "A human is someone who is aware of their imperfections" again excludes certain people from being human, namely those who have certain delusions and those whose IQ is very low.
I've got high self-awareness, so despite being arrogant and self-righteous, I am aware of my flaws (though I don't like to think of them). By this definition, I am 100% human.

Conclusion and my "human score"
"What is a human?" or "What makes one human?" continues to be a philosophical question with no definite answer. I have merely listed the answers I have come across, and in my opinion none of them are fully satisfying (the first one could be, if you don't believe in a soul / spirit connected to the human body). Maybe being human is just temporarily existing in a human body in a society with other beings in human bodies and feeling human or playing human (if you don't feel like one) while being defined as human by others so human rights are guaranteed to apply to you. In a nutshell, maybe we are spiritual beings having a human experience, and that makes us at least partially human for a while.

Now onto my "human score":
Physical: 1 point
Psychological: 0/2 points
Other: 1 point
Total: 2/4 points
I conclude that while I have a human body, I am psychologically not fully human and therefore possibly a nonhuman soul.
I am only partially human.


There are no comments to display.

Blog entry information

Last update

More entries in Uncategorized

More entries from Lighter

Share this entry